Research on the tests and measures used in forensic mental health evaluations focuses mainly on their reliability and validity in a carefully controlled research environment. Fewer studies field-test their reliability in real-life cases with consequences for people. Fewer still look at the differences among the evaluators using these tools.

Recent research has found that the reliability of those evaluations is highest in controlled environments, decreases when used in the field, and varies among evaluators, particularly in adversarial settings.

Fortunately, you can improve the reliability of your forensic evaluations by taking comprehensive training and minimizing unconscious biases.

Read more→